The Scavenger

Salvaging whats left after the masses have had their feed



Last updateWed, 12 Apr 2017 9am

Menu Style

Back You are here: Home Social Justice Animals Why a former sheep farmer went vegan

Why a former sheep farmer went vegan

sheepvegVegan science teacher Ian Brothers, a former sheep farmer, is joining the growing numbers of Australians who care about animals, according to a new poll, writes Teresa Savage.

Ian Brothers is a very passionate man with a very enquiring mind. He cares desperately about the health of the Australian nation, and he thinks our health problems are preventable. 

“Since the 1960s we’ve been increasingly addicted to the consumption of animal products,” he says. “And we also have increasing rates of cardio-vascular disease, diabetes, cancer, obesity and dementia. It’s cause and effect.” 

Brothers’ family history, professional skills and working experience have led him on a journey to veganism. “My father died suddenly when I was only 14, he says. “He was 57 and died of a heart attack. I didn’t want to go that way too.” 

When he moved from Sydney to acreage just outside Cowra, in western New South Wales, he ran sheep on the property, both Merinos for wool and South Suffolks for meat. At one time he had 500 sheep, “but the drought left me with no water or feed for them, and because I was growing more and more aware of the innate cruelty of keeping farm animals, I decided to give them away, and not replace them,” he says.  

Having studied agriculture at university, Brothers’ became a science teacher. “Science equipped me with the skills to research, analyse and understand human physiology and biochemistry, nutrition and epidemiology, and through that study I’ve come to realise that we are dead-set plant eaters.”   

Brothers reflects on the ways in which we are hooked into eating meat and dairy products, and the commercial motivation behind – for instance, being given milk at school as a child, which he says sets us up as “customers of the dairy industry from the word go”. 

Brothers is now a campaigner for a more healthy and humane lifestyle. He is a member of the Vegetarian/Vegan Society of Queensland, which recently commissioned a survey to investigate how we think about the way we treat and eat animals.  

Survey results show Australians are against animal cruelty 

Run by Newspoll, and funded by animal protection institute Voiceless, the Pound of Flesh survey interviewed 1,202 people across Australia about their attitudes to vegetarianism, veganism and the treatment of animals. 

Most of the results are not surprising. According to the poll, 99% of Australians are against animal cruelty and find certain farming, testing and breeding practices unacceptable; 86% of Australians believe keeping egg laying hens in cages for their entire lives is unacceptable, 74% think castrating animals without anaesthetic is unacceptable, and 72% also say killing male chicks in egg production is unacceptable.   

Animal breeding and testing are also subjects of considerable concern: 46% of Australians find breeding animals for pet shops unacceptable, 80% of Australians think it’s unacceptable to test cosmetics on animals, while 43% make an effort to buy non-animal tested products. 

But other results from the survey provoke a degree of scepticism. While obviously well intentioned, the claim that overall, 56% of Australians would consider becoming vegan is specious.  

When you delve deeper into the report you realise that this conclusion was reached through a line of questioning that asked what evidence or circumstances would encourage a person to become vegan, including evidence that farming practices cause stress and pain for millions of animals every year (36% agreed they would be influenced by this evidence), evidence they can be healthy on a vegan diet (35%), evidence that being vegan is better for the environment (31%), and if there were more vegan menu items in cafes or restaurants (25%). 

There are intrinsic problems for anyone conducting research in this field. 

Firstly, does an answer in the affirmative to a question about what would provoke a change in behaviour, even where the evidence is widely available to support that change, actually result in any real change in behaviour? 

All the way through this report there is a clear discrepancy between what people find unacceptable (making cows pregnant every year, for instance, and taking away their calves, which causes them huge distress) and what they actually do in practice (like enjoying milkshakes, fine cheeses and lattes). 

Secondly, there is little agreed definition for the concepts being researched. 

The report suggests this common confusion is partly caused by people who call themselves vegetarian but do not have an absolute commitment to the practice of vegetarianism and sometimes eat flesh or fish. 

The more recent incarnations of pescatarians (who eat vegetables and fish), pollotarians (vegetables and chicken) and flexitarians (intermittent vegetarians) only add to the problem.  This goes some way to explain why carnivores regularly ask vegetarians the curious and sometimes irritating question about whether they eat meat or fish. 

Gender differences in attitudes to animals 

The unexplored story in this research is the striking difference between male and female attitudes to animals. 

Women consistently display more compassion for animals than men – particularly in response to animal testing, animal research, breeding animals for pet shops, and farming practices.  

According to the results, many more men than women attend horse racing, dog racing, circuses and rodeos. 

The report does not tell us how many vegetarians or vegans are women, but it would be reasonable to expect there to be more women. Why is this so? Further exploration of this difference could be the subject of another piece of research, particularly to test the extent to which women may be able to influence children in their food choices, and what would be needed to translate women’s compassion for animals into societal change.  

In the light of the recent banning of the Animal Liberation float from the Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras Parade it would also be very interesting to look at the inter-connections between sexuality and vegetarianism and veganism, and why a group of people who are broadly progressive about personal, political and humanitarian issues have such a blind spot to the impact of their lifestyles on the other sentient beings who inhabit this planet.  

Maybe from this extended research we can work out what can be done.  


The full survey report expands on the responses to questions by exploring issues further. In addition to discussing farming practices and animal testing, it addresses the impact of livestock production on the environment, and the various ways animals are used for human entertainment.  

In this sense it is a very valuable snapshot, in that it explores rodeos and the inherent cruelty of rough riding, steer wrestling and team roping. Horse racing, dog racing, circuses, pet breeding and zoos are all exposed to the same critique. 

But again, if the research finds that 46% of Australians find breeding animals for pet shops unacceptable, why does the industry continue to thrive? 

When the Lord Mayor of Sydney, Clover Moore, introduced the Animals (Regulation of Sale) Bill in New South Wales it was met with ferocious opposition by the unregulated pet industry and was eventually defeated in November 2008. 

If there is such strong feeling against cruelty to animals, it does not translate into personal behaviour or representation by the body politic. 

Which directly leads to the question of what can we do if we understand the link between the oppression of animals and the oppression of people, and are concerned about the welfare of animals in our society.  

After all, as the report notes: “Other animals are on the same continuum we are.”  The report itself simply recommends, over and over, that if you are concerned: “Don’t support animal exploitation – be vegan”.  

Extrapolating from this research, a mere 2% of Australians are vegetarian, and an even smaller 0.06% are vegan. It will take a very long time to achieve the critical mass necessary to impact the livestock industry, the environment and animals themselves. 

It’s not enough to simply change our own personal behaviour; pressure must be brought to bear on politicians and the food, farming and pet industries. 

And this is exactly what Ian Brothers does. He now spends his time lobbying, campaigning and “generally making a pest of myself” about the health implications of eating animal products, and the health benefits of veganism. 

He’s happy to tackle some of our most prestigious and traditional organisations. “Take the Country Women’s Association cookbooks,” he says. “They’re full of recipes which are killing their husbands and children.”  

He’s a very passionate and persuasive man. I’ll certainly add the Country Women’s Association Vegan for Health cookbook to my collection if and when Brothers convinces them to publish it. 

The full survey report is available free of charge here and further information from the Vegetarian/Vegan Society of Queensland. 

Teresa Savage is a Sydney-based writer, who has been a vegetarian for over 30 years, has raised three vegetarian children (one now vegan) and is interested in the nexus between our food choices, gender and sexuality.


0 #11 i_vegan 2010-03-31 22:51
many people would like to know what happened to the 500 sheep, so if you don't mind letting me know, I would appreciate it :-)
0 #10 revolutionary 2010-03-19 03:53
@ Alex - no problem. I understand that people who choose to be vegan have to contend with a lot of misinformation and other crap, so I understand you being right onto the details.
We might have to agree to disagree on the extent to which individual's dietry needs are different, but I do agree that whatever those differences are, there's no reason why a vegan diet cannot meet any person's needs.

@Rico - thanks for the links, especially the one to Ed. He's precisely the kind of guy I extra-admire.
And you're right - there is absolutely no reason why I couldn't forgo animal-based products as a transguy (or any other kind of guy or girl for that matter!) - barring my personal motivation.
I do eat far less meat than I used too, I do substitute at times, but I'm sorry I can't promise you that I'll go completely meat (or animal product) free any time soon.
Nothing but respect and support for those who are vegan from me, it's just not for me (at least not right now - I know better than to say 'never'!)
0 #9 Alex Melonas 2010-03-18 14:35

I assure you, I am not grumpy at all. I am just correcting the record, as it were, because the level of misinformation out there as regards this issue is astonishing, really.

But I do have to quibble with another rather problematic aspect in your last comment. In the minutia, if you will, every individual might have different dietary needs based on the criterion you suggested. However, in general, at the level of actual nutritional needs for members of our species, which is the level of analysis for the American Dietetic Association, every individual does in fact not have different dietary needs. Veganism is health at all stages of the life cycle for all of us.

Indeed, the evidence would suggest that the dietary difficulties some people have with veganism are centered on poor food choices, the absence of will power, misinformation, or psychological phenomena (read not actual nutritional needs).
0 #8 Rico 2010-03-18 11:32
i see i can't edit my comments, so just wanted to clarify that when i suggested the 'meat alternatives' at a good asian restaurant, i meant an asian *veg* restaurant. there are several in the major cities around Australia.
0 #7 Rico 2010-03-18 11:25
hi r(evolutionary)

your case as a trans guy is a really interesting one. i'd never really thought about the change people might make to the food they eat when they alter their sex. somebody's probably done studies on it i guess!

that said, i don't see any reason why you couldn't forego animal products as a trans guy. same applies to anyone else that's not vegan. if you accept that vegans can be healthy, then why would you choose to foster the suffering and death involved in animals products?

if it's the taste and 'feel' of animal products you like, then there are quite a few commercial animal product alternatives, as well as recipes to prepare your own. obviously some will be more in line with your tastes than other, and some will be more like the real thing and others less.

if you're in australia, fry's burgers and sausages are an example. have you tried eating the meat alternatives at a good asian restaurant? there's a whole section devoted to recipes for 'Meat, Dairy and Egg Alternatives' on this page (you need to scroll about halfway down the page):

just today i read the profile of the vegan bodybuilder Ed Bauer:

He says some interesting things in that. I hope you'll have a read...

Good wishes!
0 #6 revolutionary 2010-03-17 21:05
Alex -

You sound a little grumpy? I was just musing/question ing and definitely not trying to discredit!

Critically, I don't refute or contest at all that being vegan isn't a very healthy way to be.
I just reckon going animal-protein- free is harder for some than others - as you'd know, every individual has different dietry needs depending on their blood group, level of activity (etc etc). Still, I also don't think that makes it impossible for anyone to go animal-protein- free - it just means that I have a lot of respect for (for example) male body builders who manage to be vego/vegan.
0 #5 Anne Kjersti Bjørndal 2010-03-17 11:03
Good article..

I think meat; (organically/wi ld) is ok once in a while-(as with free range etc.). As for milk, I've read there are different attitudes among organic farmeres re. when the calf shall be removed...But to be removed just after birth - should be written on the cartoon..

Yes; I went to Biology class last year, and there where people there who had no idea that the cow is constantly insemenated and the calf removed from the mother-almost right after birth--(and there goes calf meat too...)

I believe if each person who wanted to buy meat/milk etc. themselves had to "kill the cow" - or not not mention - had a visit to the butcheries etc. there would be a lot more sensitive customers....


Anne K.Bjørndal
Norway(p.t. Odense/DK)

But how to get there? That's why people like Brother is important-(esp. since he himself has been a factory farmer).

0 #4 Alex Melonas 2010-03-17 09:17

The relevant data unequivocally refutes your intuition, experience, or whatever. According to the American Dietetic Association, a vegan diet is healthy at all stages of the life-cycle for members of our species. This holds for both sexes. What this suggests is a cultural distinction, because physiologically , males and females of our species do not differ in this respect.

Furthermore, Brothers wasn't arguing (as your straw man would have it) that meat = all health problems, but rather that the empirical evidence convincingly proves that the consumption of meat, as we have been doing it since the 60's, does indeed lead to more health problems. Inactivity, stress, etc. are epiphenomenal here. Even conservative dieticians concede this point.
0 #3 Patty Shenker 2010-03-16 22:46
How wonderful that Australia & New Zealand have their own Howard Lyman now/! For those of you who don't know who he is, Howard is an American fifth generation feedlot operator who, after a serious illness he believes was due to the pesticides he was using on his "cattle', has dedicated his life to educating people to the need to stop the factory farm madness & actually choose a vegan lifestyle- for your health, the animals and the planet! His book is titled- "Mad Cowboy". I've always heard that Australia was about 20 years behind the America and I think that's very true when it comes to vegetarianism/v eganism- gaging from my 7 visits there! I hope Ian Brothers has as much success in educating and changing people's eating habits and health as Howard has and I wish him the best of luck!
0 #2 revolutionary 2010-03-16 20:45
The gender difference thing is interesting.

I'm a 'post-transitio n' transguy and I have to say that now as a boy my need for protein is substantially more noticeable than before. I try to reduce my meat intake (and only buy free range in what I do eat) - but notice that if it's been 2-3 days meat free I start a) feeling a bit 'off' and b) craving a very bug chunk of meat. Addressing b) quickly solves a) - and that's even with me being good about eating non-animal protein during my meat free days.

Of course I'm not saying boys can't be vegetarian or vegan - of coure they can, and there are plenty that are.. I just wonder, based on my own experiences and talking too others, if there's more of a hormonal/metabo lic/physiologic al reason why blokes eat meat?

A comment too on the assertion by Brothers in the beginning that more meat since the 60s = more health problems. I have no doubt there's a link, but I think it's simplistic to say that that is the whole story without looking at other risk factors such as increased alcohol consumption, increased stress levels, more sedentry lifestyles and increased environmental pollutants. I think it weakens the vegetarian/vega n argument to not present the full story and overstate the role of meat-eating..

Add comment

Security code

Share this post

Submit to DeliciousSubmit to DiggSubmit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TechnoratiSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn

Personal Development

Be the change.